Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
Social › Abortion
9>9 Personal answerPro-life |
Domestic Policy › Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Drug Price Regulation
9>9 Personal answerYes if the companies with higher drug prices are not investing the money into other live saving care. Lifesaving drugs should be more accessible to all, it should not be to line the pockets of the rich. Same with health care in general, if it's going to bettering society, fine. But if it's just for corporate greed, people's lives should be more important. So not socialism, but reform it to be beneficial to patients and businesses. |
Social › Planned Parenthood Funding
9>9 Personal answerNo |
the Economy › Minimum Wage
9>9 Personal answerYes, and adjust it every year according to inflation |
Domestic Policy › Armed Teachers
9>9 Personal answerNo, hire professionally trained security guards instead |
the Environment › Climate Change
9>9 Personal answerNo, provide more incentives for alternative energy production instead |
the Economy › Taxes
9>9 Personal answerLower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations |
Education › Critical Race Theory in K-12 Education
9>9 Personal answerNo, kids should be raised to be racially color blind instead of being taught they are inherently racist or disadvantaged based on the color of their skin |
Education › Student Loans
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Education › Free College for All
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Domestic Policy › No-Fly List Gun Control
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › Medicaid
9>9 Personal answerYes, on a Case by case basis |
Science › Mandatory Vaccinations
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with some exceptions for religious beliefs (depending on deadly contagious diseases, possibly still require those) but with consideration also for individuals chemical makeups and consultation with doctors. |
Crime › Qualified Immunity for Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with extreme consideration and with more training and education for police officers. |
Immigration › Immigration Healthcare
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Elections › Voter Fraud
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Healthcare › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Immigration › Border Wall
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Crime › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Elections › Right of Foreigners to Vote
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Crime › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
Immigration › In-State Tuition
9>9 Personal answerNo |
the Environment › Oil Drilling
9>9 Personal answerNo, but maintain our current offshore oil wells |
Foreign Policy › United Nations
9>9 Personal answerYes, but scale back our current involvement |
the Economy › Overtime Pay
9>9 Personal answerYes |
Social › Student Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Foreign Policy › Military Spending
9>9 Personal answerIncrease |
Elections › Electoral College
9>9 Personal answerNo, but reform so that votes are distributed proportionally instead of the current winner take all system |
Science › Nuclear Energy
9>9 Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
Science › GMO Labels
9>9 Personal answerYes, consumers have a right to know what is in their food |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Transportation › Public Transportation
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions |
Foreign Policy › Terrorism
9>9 Personal answerNo, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture |
National Security › Military Congressional Approval
9>9 Personal answerNo, should involve the President, Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Secretary of State (those with knowledge of war and current state of affairs, with ability to quickly convene, rather than wait to assemble congress) |
the Environment › Paris Climate Agreement
9>9 Personal answerYes, until other countries are held to the same standards |
National Security › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerIf capture is not possible, only if they are in countries not allied to the US. At which point, counties should be able to join in the capture or killing of suspected terrorists in their country. If in nations like mentioned above that will not be allied but are known to be harborers of terrorists, lethal force should be authorized if they are a threat to the US and our allies. |
National Security › Mexican Drug Cartels
9>9 Personal answerYes, but for operations within our borders, and attempt to join Mexican forces to mobilize both countries against Mexican drug cartels, unless drug cartels have been proven to be infiltrated into government functions (corruption) at which point, depending on devastation to US population, US military mobilization should be authorized. |
Housing › High density residential buildings
9>9 Personal answerNo |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. This theme is most important to you.
You are a centrist on left wing and right wing issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on democratic socialism and capitalism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. This theme is more important to you.
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. This theme is more important to you.
You side slightly towards “religious”, meaning you more often support policies that reflect religious values and principles. This theme is more important to you.
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on pacifism and militarism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You are a centrist on individualism and collectivism issues. This theme is somewhat important to you.
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on small government and big government issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on keynesian and laissez-faire issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. This theme is only less important to you.
You are a centrist on meritocracy and democracy issues. This theme is only less important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked more important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked somewhat important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked less important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.