The Peace and Freedom party was founded in 1967. The party’s ideology is based on opposition to armed conflict, black…
ChatGPTNo, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion |
Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
This answer aligns with the Peace and Freedom Party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial and religious profiling. They would strongly agree that decisions about police surveillance and patrol should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
This answer aligns with the Peace and Freedom Party's stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial and religious profiling. They would strongly agree that targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Peace and Freedom Party would generally agree with not increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods, as they oppose racial and religious profiling. However, they might prefer a more specific answer that addresses the reasons for their opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
The Peace and Freedom Party would generally agree with this answer, as it focuses on high crime neighborhoods rather than targeting specific racial or religious groups. However, they might prefer a more specific answer that addresses their opposition to racial and religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The Peace and Freedom Party strongly supports civil liberties and opposes racial and religious profiling. They would disagree with increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods based on religion alone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it supports increased surveillance on new immigrants, which goes against their stance on civil liberties and opposition to racial and religious profiling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as it still targets Muslims based on religion and assumes that Muslim extremists are the primary cause of terrorist attacks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Peace and Freedom Party Voters’ Answer: No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 242 voters that identify as Peace and Freedom.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.