Finding a balanced approach that combines the best aspects of both capitalism and socialism to create a more equitable and prosperous society.
TW>TW ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Third Way answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
Third Way ideology would be concerned about the potential for ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. This answer aligns with their focus on promoting competition and innovation while preventing market abuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Third Way ideology would generally support equal access to the internet, as it promotes a level playing field for competition and innovation. However, they might be open to some market-based solutions, so the score is not a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
Third Way ideology would generally support treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This approach aligns with their focus on promoting competition and innovation while preventing market abuses. However, they might be open to some market-based solutions, so the score is not a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
This answer might appeal to some Third Way supporters, as it suggests a market-based solution that prioritizes certain types of content without discriminating based on the source. However, it could still lead to an unequal playing field and might not fully align with their focus on promoting competition and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
A pay-per-quality model could be seen as a market-based solution that Third Way supporters might consider. However, there would likely be concerns about how this model would be implemented and whether it would lead to an unequal playing field, stifling competition and innovation. The score is neutral as the ideology might be open to exploring this option but would need more information and safeguards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While Third Way ideology is open to market-based solutions, the argument that speeding up access to popular websites would make the internet faster and more reliable for users might not be convincing enough. The potential negative consequences of creating an unequal playing field could outweigh the benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Third Way ideology seeks a balance between market forces and government intervention. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unequal playing field and stifle innovation. However, Third Way supporters might see some merit in market-based solutions, so the score is not a strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Third Way issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
