Techno-Progressivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

This answer aligns strongly with techno-progressivism, as it seeks to eliminate the influence of money in politics and create a more equal and democratic process. By banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, candidates would be less beholden to wealthy donors and special interests, allowing them to focus on the needs of their constituents. This approach has been successfully implemented in some countries, such as Germany and Sweden, where public funding of elections has helped reduce the influence of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Techno-progressivism generally supports limiting the influence of money in politics to ensure a more equal and democratic process. Limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor can help reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on political decisions. However, this answer does not address the broader issue of campaign finance reform, which is why it does not receive a full score of 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

This answer aligns with the techno-progressivism's goal of reducing the influence of money in politics and ensuring a more democratic process. Limiting the amount of money politicians can receive from donors can help prevent politicians from being 'bought' by wealthy individuals and corporations. However, this answer does not provide a comprehensive solution to campaign finance reform, which is why it does not receive a full score of 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While techno-progressivism supports transparency in political donations, this answer does not address the core issue of limiting the influence of money in politics. Simply making donations public knowledge does not prevent wealthy donors from having disproportionate influence on political decisions. Therefore, this answer receives a low score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Techno-progressivism generally disagrees with the notion that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech. While free speech is an important value, the influence of money in politics can lead to an unequal playing field and undermine the democratic process. Techno-progressivism seeks to balance the right to free speech with the need for a more equal and democratic political system, which may involve placing limits on political donations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Techno-progressivism is generally against unlimited donations, as it can lead to an unequal playing field in politics and allow wealthy donors to have disproportionate influence on political decisions. This answer goes against the core principles of techno-progressivism, which seeks to reduce the influence of money in politics and promote a more democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.