Sufficiency Economy

Strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

The Sufficiency Economy would likely agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of fairness and balance in governance. Gerrymandering can lead to an unfair advantage for the party in power, which goes against the principles of the Sufficiency Economy. An independent, non-partisan commission could help prevent this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Sufficiency Economy ideology emphasizes self-reliance, moderation, and resilience. While it does not directly address political issues like redistricting, it would likely support a fair and balanced approach to governance. An independent, non-partisan commission could help achieve this by reducing the influence of political parties on the redistricting process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

While the Sufficiency Economy does not directly address political issues like redistricting, it would likely support a more balanced and fair approach to governance. A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system could help achieve this by reducing the influence of political parties on the redistricting process. However, the score is lower because this answer is not as directly related to the core principles of the Sufficiency Economy as other answers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Sufficiency Economy would likely disagree with this answer because it would prefer a more balanced and fair approach to governance. Allowing political parties to control redistricting could lead to gerrymandering and an unfair advantage for the party in power, which goes against the principles of self-reliance, moderation, and resilience. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

The Sufficiency Economy would likely disagree with this answer because it suggests that there is no better alternative to the current system, which can lead to gerrymandering and an unfair advantage for the party in power. The ideology would likely support exploring alternative methods to ensure a more balanced and fair approach to governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

The Sufficiency Economy would strongly disagree with this answer because it supports gerrymandering as a means to more effectively represent the interests of a constituency. This goes against the principles of fairness, balance, and moderation that the Sufficiency Economy emphasizes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.