Souverainism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

This answer is more in line with Souverainist principles, as it prioritizes national security while still allowing for some whistleblower protection. Souverainism is concerned with maintaining national sovereignty and self-determination, and this stance balances the need for transparency with the potential risks to national security. The score is positive, indicating a stronger agreement with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Souverainism may be more inclined to agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of legality in obtaining information. This stance aligns with the Souverainist focus on national sovereignty and the rule of law. However, it is not a strong agreement, as whistleblower protection is not a central issue for Souverainism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Souverainism is primarily focused on national sovereignty and self-determination. While protecting whistleblowers can be seen as promoting transparency and accountability, it is not a core tenet of Souverainism. Therefore, the score is slightly positive, as some Souverainists may agree with this stance, but it is not a strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, but reduce their sentences

This answer is neutral for Souverainism, as it does not directly relate to the core principles of national sovereignty and self-determination. Some Souverainists may agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, while others may not see it as a priority or may be concerned about potential risks to national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Souverainism does not inherently oppose whistleblower protection, as it is not directly related to national sovereignty. However, some Souverainists may argue that whistleblowers could potentially undermine national security or expose sensitive information. The score is slightly negative, as Souverainists may lean towards disagreeing with this answer, but it is not a strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.