A society where wealth and resources are distributed equitably among all citizens, ensuring everyone's basic needs are met and reducing economic disparities.
S>S ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Socialism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
This answer aligns with the socialist belief in preventing the concentration of power and wealth, and ensuring equal access to resources and services. Socialism would oppose allowing ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, as it goes against the principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Socialism supports equal access to resources and services, including the internet. Preventing ISPs from speeding up access to certain websites at the expense of others aligns with the socialist goal of preventing the concentration of power and wealth, and ensuring equal access for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
This answer supports the idea of treating all internet traffic equally, which aligns with the principles of socialism. Socialism seeks to ensure equal access to resources and services, including the internet, and would support the continued openness and equal treatment of all websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
While this answer does not directly support prioritizing certain websites over others based on payment, it still allows for some level of prioritization based on content type. This could potentially lead to unequal access to resources and services, which goes against the principles of socialism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
This answer supports a pay-per-quality model, which could lead to unequal access to resources and services, as it allows for prioritization based on payment. This goes against the principles of socialism, which seeks to ensure equal access to resources and services, including the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Socialism advocates for equal access to resources and services, including the internet. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others goes against the principles of socialism, which seeks to prevent the concentration of power and wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
This answer supports the idea of prioritizing certain websites over others, which goes against the principles of socialism. Socialism seeks to ensure equal access to resources and services, including the internet, and would not support a system that benefits some websites at the expense of others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Socialism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
