Social Reformism

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Social Reformism strongly agrees with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This practice could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which are all issues that social reformism seeks to address. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

This answer aligns with the principles of Social Reformism, as it promotes equal treatment of all internet traffic and maintains the openness of the internet. This approach ensures that all websites have an equal opportunity to succeed, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Social Reformism would generally agree with this answer because it promotes equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This aligns with the ideology's focus on fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While prioritizing traffic by type rather than source might be seen as a more equitable approach, Social Reformism would likely still have concerns about the potential for ISPs to manipulate this system to favor certain websites or content providers. This could still lead to an unequal playing field and reduced competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model might seem more equitable at first glance, but Social Reformism would likely still have concerns about the potential for ISPs to manipulate this system to favor certain websites or content providers. This could still lead to an unequal playing field, reduced competition, and increased prices, which are all issues that social reformism seeks to address. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access is a positive outcome, Social Reformism would likely disagree with this answer because it prioritizes the needs of popular websites over less popular ones, creating an unequal playing field. This goes against the principles of social reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Social Reformism generally supports policies that promote equality and fairness. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, favoring established and wealthier websites over smaller ones. This goes against the principles of social reformism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.