Settler Interests

Very strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Settler Interests ideology would strongly agree with the idea that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors. This aligns with their values of fairness and equal opportunity in political representation. Limiting the influence of wealthy donors would help ensure that candidates focus on representing their constituents rather than catering to special interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Settler Interests ideology would likely agree with banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. This approach would promote fairness and equal opportunity in political representation, which are values that settlers often prioritize. Publicly funded elections would help ensure that candidates are not beholden to wealthy donors and can focus on representing their constituents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Settler Interests ideology would somewhat agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor. This is because settlers often value fairness and equal opportunity in political representation. However, this ideology does not inherently prioritize campaign finance reform as a primary issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

Settler Interests ideology would slightly agree with having no limits on political donations as long as they are public knowledge. While transparency is important, this approach does not fully address the potential for an imbalance of power and influence in politics. Settlers may prefer more comprehensive campaign finance reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Settler Interests ideology would somewhat disagree with having no limits on political donations. While settlers may appreciate the idea of free speech, they also value fairness and equal opportunity in political representation. Unlimited donations could lead to an imbalance of power and influence in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Settler Interests ideology would somewhat disagree with the idea that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech. While settlers may appreciate the importance of free speech, they also prioritize fairness and equal opportunity in political representation. They would likely view campaign finance reform as a necessary measure to prevent an imbalance of power and influence in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.