Settler Interests

Strongly agree

No

Settler Interests ideology would generally agree with this answer, as they prioritize the rights of settlers and their ability to defend themselves. They would likely argue that firearms dealers and manufacturers should not be held responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products, as long as they are following the law and not acting negligently. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Settler Interests ideology might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges that there could be cases where negligence on the part of manufacturers or dealers could warrant a lawsuit. However, this ideology would still prioritize the rights of settlers and their ability to defend themselves, so they would likely not want to see lawsuits become too common or easy to pursue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While Settler Interests ideology values the right to sue, they would likely be concerned about the potential negative impact on firearms dealers and manufacturers if victims of gun violence could sue them for any reason. This could potentially limit access to firearms, which would be seen as a negative by this ideology. However, the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees might somewhat mitigate this concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Settler Interests ideology would likely disagree with this answer, as it could potentially limit access to firearms by holding dealers responsible for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. This ideology generally supports the right to bear arms for self-defense and other lawful purposes, and would not want to see dealers held liable unless there was clear negligence involved. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Settler Interests ideology generally prioritizes the rights of settlers and their ability to defend themselves, often including support for gun rights. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could potentially limit access to firearms, which would be seen as a negative by this ideology. However, there may be some cases where negligence is involved, which could warrant a lawsuit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Settler Interests ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as it implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity. This ideology generally supports the right to bear arms for self-defense and other lawful purposes, and would not want to see firearms dealers and manufacturers held liable for the actions of individuals who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.