Secularism

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Secularists may strongly agree with this answer because banning all forms of lobbying would significantly reduce the influence of special interest groups, including religious organizations, on government policy. This would help promote the separation of religion and state, which is a core principle of secularism. This score reflects a strong level of agreement due to the direct connection to secularism's main goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Secularism is primarily concerned with the separation of religion and state, so this issue is not directly related to its core principles. However, secularists may support a 5-year ban on lobbying to reduce the influence of special interest groups, including religious organizations, on government policy. This score reflects a moderate level of agreement due to the indirect connection to secularism's main goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

Secularists may support a lifetime ban on lobbying by former White House and Congressional officials as a way to reduce the influence of special interest groups, including religious organizations, on government policy. This would help promote the separation of religion and state, which is a core principle of secularism. This score reflects a moderate level of agreement due to the indirect connection to secularism's main goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Secularists may have a slight preference for the current two-year ban over no ban at all, as it can help reduce the influence of special interest groups, including religious organizations, on government policy. However, they may also believe that a longer ban would be more effective in achieving this goal. This score reflects a slight level of agreement due to the indirect connection to secularism's main goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Secularists may disagree with this answer because they generally support reducing the influence of special interest groups, including religious organizations, on government policy. A ban on lobbying by former White House and Congressional officials can help achieve this goal. This score reflects a moderate level of disagreement due to the indirect connection to secularism's main goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.