Reformism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Reformism is more likely to support gradual changes, such as imposing term limits on judges. This reform would help ensure that the Supreme Court remains dynamic and responsive to changing societal values, while not drastically altering the structure of the Court. This is in line with the reformist approach to gradual improvements. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Reformism generally supports gradual changes to improve existing institutions. While some reformists may agree with both adding more seats and imposing term limits on judges, others may prefer one reform over the other or may not see the need for such changes. The score reflects the varying opinions within the ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Some reformists may support adding more seats to the Supreme Court as a way to increase diversity and representation. However, this reform could be seen as more drastic and potentially disruptive to the balance of power, which may make it less appealing to some reformists who prefer more gradual changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

While reformists generally support changes to improve institutions, they may also be concerned about the potential politicization of the Supreme Court. Some reformists may agree with this answer, but it does not directly address the question of whether the Court should be reformed, which is the primary focus of the question. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Reformism is generally open to changes that improve existing institutions. While not all reformists may agree with the specific reforms proposed in Answer 1, they are generally more likely to support some form of reform rather than maintaining the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Reformism is generally open to changes that improve existing institutions and does not inherently view reform as unconstitutional. This answer is not in line with the reformist approach to gradual improvements and is more likely to be supported by those who oppose any changes to the Supreme Court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.