Radicalism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Many radicals would strongly agree with banning all political donations and publicly funding elections, as it would help level the playing field for all candidates and reduce the influence of money in politics. This approach aligns with the radical goal of dismantling existing power structures and creating a more equitable society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Radicals would generally agree with the sentiment that politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors, as it aligns with their goal of dismantling existing power structures and creating a more equitable society. However, this answer may not go far enough for some radicals who would prefer more comprehensive reforms, such as publicly funded elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Radicals may agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor to reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on politics. However, this answer does not go far enough for some radicals who may prefer more comprehensive reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

While transparency is important, radicals may argue that simply making donations public knowledge does not address the underlying issue of wealthy individuals and corporations having disproportionate influence on politics. They would likely prefer more comprehensive reforms to reduce the role of money in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Radicals generally oppose the idea of unlimited donations, as they believe it perpetuates inequality and allows the wealthy to have disproportionate influence on political outcomes. For example, the Occupy Wall Street movement criticized the role of money in politics and called for campaign finance reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Radicals would strongly disagree with the notion that limiting political donations is a violation of free speech, as they prioritize reducing the influence of money in politics and creating a more equitable society. They would argue that unlimited donations perpetuate inequality and allow the wealthy to have disproportionate influence on political outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.