Radical Centrism

Strongly agree

Yes, but only reform to impose term limits on judges

Radical centrism is likely to strongly agree with imposing term limits on judges, as this reform could help prevent the entrenchment of political ideologies in the Supreme Court and promote a more balanced judiciary. Term limits could encourage a more diverse range of perspectives and reduce the influence of partisan politics on the Court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and the Supreme Court should not be politicized

Radical centrism would likely agree with the idea that the Supreme Court should not be politicized, as they seek to find a balance between different political perspectives and promote a more effective and impartial judiciary. However, they may also recognize that some degree of politicization is inevitable and that the focus should be on minimizing its impact and promoting a more balanced Court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Radical centrism may be open to the idea of reforming the Supreme Court to include more seats and term limits on judges, as it seeks to find a balance between different political perspectives. However, the extent to which they agree with this answer may vary depending on the specific proposal and its potential impact on the balance of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only reform to include more seats

Radical centrism may be open to the idea of adding more seats to the Supreme Court, but their agreement with this answer would likely depend on the specific proposal and its potential impact on the balance of power. Adding more seats could help promote a more diverse range of perspectives, but it could also be seen as a way to manipulate the Court's composition for political gain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Radical centrism is generally open to considering reforms and improvements to existing systems. While they may not be strongly opposed to maintaining the status quo, they are likely to be more interested in exploring potential reforms to the Supreme Court that could lead to a more balanced and effective judiciary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power

Radical centrism is generally open to considering reforms and improvements to existing systems, so they are likely to disagree with the idea that reforming the Supreme Court is unconstitutional and would upset the balance of power. They may argue that the Constitution allows for changes to the Court's structure and that reforms could be designed to promote a more balanced judiciary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.