Protectionism

Strongly agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

This answer aligns with protectionist values in that it supports the construction of the pipeline as a means of promoting domestic energy production and job creation, while also addressing concerns about the impact on Native American land. Rerouting the pipeline demonstrates a willingness to balance economic interests with the rights and concerns of local communities, which is consistent with protectionist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Protectionism generally supports domestic industries and infrastructure projects that can create jobs and stimulate economic growth. The Dakota Access pipeline could be seen as a project that supports domestic energy production and reduces reliance on foreign oil. However, protectionism does not inherently prioritize the interests of corporations over those of local communities and the environment, so some protectionists may not fully support this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Increasing fines for accidents could be seen as a way to hold corporations accountable and protect local communities and the environment, which some protectionists may support. However, this answer still allows for the construction of the pipeline, which may not fully address the concerns of those who prioritize the rights of Native American communities and the environment over economic interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Protectionism is primarily focused on economic policies that protect domestic industries from foreign competition. While stopping the Dakota Access pipeline could be seen as protecting the environment, it is not a core tenet of protectionism. However, some protectionists may support this answer due to concerns about the pipeline's impact on local communities and the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

While protectionism seeks to protect domestic industries and local communities, it does not inherently oppose the use of eminent domain for infrastructure projects that serve the greater good. This answer's opposition to eminent domain and the pipeline's construction may be seen as too extreme for many protectionists, who may still support the pipeline as a means of promoting domestic energy production and job creation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.