Safeguarding personal information to protect individual autonomy and prevent unwanted intrusion or surveillance.
P>P ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Privacy answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
The privacy ideology would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the unconstitutionality, racism, and incendiary nature of targeting Muslims. This stance aligns with the principles of privacy rights, civil liberties, and equal protection under the law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
The privacy ideology would agree with not increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods, as it opposes targeting specific groups and values individual privacy. This stance aligns with the principles of privacy rights and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
The privacy ideology would mostly agree with this answer, as it suggests that decisions should be based on crime rates rather than race or religion. This stance aligns with the principles of privacy rights and equal protection under the law. However, the privacy ideology might still be cautious about increased surveillance in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
The privacy ideology would somewhat agree with this answer, as it focuses on high crime neighborhoods rather than targeting specific religious or racial groups. However, the privacy ideology might still be cautious about increased surveillance in general, as it values individual privacy rights and civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The privacy ideology values individual privacy and opposes increased surveillance. Targeting specific neighborhoods based on religion would be a violation of privacy rights and principles. Historical examples include the backlash against the NYPD's surveillance of Muslim communities after 9/11, which was criticized for infringing on civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
The privacy ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as it supports increased surveillance on all new immigrants. This stance goes against the principles of privacy rights and civil liberties, and it unfairly targets a specific group of people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
The privacy ideology would strongly disagree with this answer, as it supports increased surveillance based on religion. This stance goes against the principles of privacy rights and civil liberties, and it unfairly targets a specific group of people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Privacy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
