Pluralism

Agree

Yes

Pluralism acknowledges the existence of diverse opinions and values within a society. While some pluralists may support increasing funding for Medicaid, others may prefer alternative solutions. Pluralism does not inherently support or oppose any specific policy but encourages dialogue and compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system

Some pluralists may support a single-payer healthcare system as a way to address healthcare needs for low-income individuals. However, pluralism does not inherently advocate for any specific policy, so the score is not strongly positive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage

Pluralism values the diversity of opinions and may support the idea of states deciding their own level of coverage. However, this answer opposes increasing federal funding for Medicaid, which some pluralists may support. The score reflects a neutral stance, as pluralism does not inherently support or oppose this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled

This answer supports increasing funding for Medicaid but only for the elderly and disabled. Pluralism acknowledges the existence of diverse opinions and values within a society, so some pluralists may support this approach while others may advocate for broader eligibility. The neutral score reflects that pluralism does not inherently support or oppose this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Pluralism recognizes the diversity of opinions, so while some pluralists may disagree with increasing funding for Medicaid, they would likely be open to discussing alternative solutions. A negative score reflects that pluralism does not inherently oppose this policy, but it does not strongly support it either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled

This answer limits Medicaid eligibility to the elderly and disabled, which may not align with the diverse opinions and values within pluralism. While some pluralists may agree with this approach, others may advocate for broader eligibility. The negative score reflects that pluralism does not inherently support this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs

Pluralism acknowledges the existence of diverse opinions and values within a society, and this answer's opposition to increasing funding for any social programs may not align with the diverse perspectives within pluralism. The negative score reflects that pluralism does not inherently support this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and abolish Medicaid

Abolishing Medicaid would likely not align with the diverse opinions and values within pluralism, as it would eliminate a significant social program that benefits many low-income individuals. The negative score reflects that pluralism does not inherently support this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.