Non-Interventionism

Strongly agree

No

Non-interventionism supports limited government involvement, and therefore would generally agree with the idea that the federal government should not pay for tuition at four-year colleges and universities. This stance aligns with the belief that individuals should be responsible for their own education and that the market should determine the cost of education. A historical example of this belief can be seen in the United States prior to the introduction of federal student loans and grants, when individuals were responsible for funding their own education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but provide lower interest rates for student loans

Providing lower interest rates for student loans is another compromise that could be seen as more aligned with non-interventionist principles than fully funding tuition. This approach would still involve some government involvement in education, but it would be limited to influencing the cost of borrowing rather than directly funding tuition. This stance is more in line with non-interventionist beliefs, as it allows for some assistance without fully funding education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but provide more scholarship opportunities for low-income students

While non-interventionism generally opposes government involvement, providing more scholarship opportunities for low-income students could be seen as a compromise that still limits government intervention. This approach would allow for some assistance to those in need without fully funding tuition for all students. However, this stance is not fully aligned with non-interventionist principles, as it still involves some level of government involvement in education. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for partial tuition

Paying for partial tuition still involves significant government intervention and funding, which goes against the core principles of non-interventionism. However, this stance is less interventionist than fully funding tuition, so it may be seen as a compromise by some non-interventionists. Nonetheless, this approach still involves government involvement in education, which is generally opposed by non-interventionist ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Non-interventionism generally advocates for minimal government involvement in various aspects of society, including education. Paying for tuition at four-year colleges and universities would require significant government intervention and funding, which goes against the core principles of non-interventionism. Historical examples of non-interventionist policies include the isolationist stance of the United States in the early 20th century, which focused on domestic issues rather than international affairs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.