By avoiding interference in other nations' affairs, a country can promote peace, stability, and prosperity for all.
NI>NI ChatGPTNo, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary |
Non-Interventionism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, targeting Muslims is unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary
Non-interventionism would agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of civil liberties and opposes government overreach. Targeting Muslims would be seen as unconstitutional, racist, and incendiary, which goes against the principles of non-interventionism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this decision should be based on crime rates instead of race or religion
Non-interventionism would agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of basing decisions on crime rates rather than race or religion. This stance aligns with non-interventionist principles of limited government interference and protection of civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Non-interventionism would generally agree with not increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods, as it opposes government overreach and interference in people's lives. However, this answer does not provide a specific reason for this stance, so the score is not as high as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but police should increase surveillance and patrol of all high crime neighborhoods
Non-interventionism would somewhat agree with this answer because it supports increased surveillance and patrol based on crime rates rather than race or religion. However, non-interventionism also emphasizes limited government interference, so the support for increased surveillance in general is not as strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and increase surveillance on all new immigrants
Non-interventionism would generally disagree with this answer because it supports increased surveillance on all new immigrants, which can be seen as government overreach and a violation of civil liberties. However, this answer is not as strongly opposed as those specifically targeting Muslims. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Non-interventionism generally opposes government overreach and interference in people's lives. Increasing surveillance and patrol of Muslim neighborhoods would be seen as an unnecessary intrusion and a violation of civil liberties. This position is consistent with historical non-interventionist opposition to the Patriot Act and other surveillance measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, until the frequency of terrorist attacks by Muslim extremists decrease
Non-interventionism would disagree with this answer because it supports increased surveillance and patrol based on a specific religious group. This stance goes against the non-interventionist belief in limited government interference and protection of civil liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Non-Interventionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
