Neo-Libertarianism

Very strongly agree

Yes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed

This answer aligns closely with Neo-Libertarian views. It supports the right to bear arms and suggests a practical solution for ensuring school safety. The requirement for at least one armed individual on school premises could be seen as a compromise that respects individual rights while also addressing safety concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed

This answer aligns closely with Neo-Libertarian values by combining the advocacy for the right to bear arms with a pragmatic approach to school safety. Requiring at least one teacher or security guard to be armed could be seen as a compromise that respects individual rights while addressing the need for protection against threats. This stance reflects the Neo-Libertarian belief in the effectiveness of armed individuals in deterring crime and ensuring safety, without imposing overly restrictive measures on gun ownership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Neo-Libertarianism is a political philosophy that combines libertarian and neoconservative views, advocating for both economic and personal freedom. This includes the right to bear arms, which would extend to teachers in schools. However, the score is not a full 5 because some Neo-Libertarians may still have concerns about safety and proper training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Neo-Libertarianism, with its emphasis on individual rights and minimal government intervention, would likely support the idea of teachers having the option to carry guns as a means of self-defense and protection of students. This stance aligns with the broader libertarian advocacy for the Second Amendment rights and the belief in personal responsibility and self-governance. However, the score is not a full 5 because Neo-Libertarians might also consider the importance of proper training and certification for those carrying firearms in schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, hire professionally trained security guards instead

While hiring professionally trained security guards might seem like a reasonable approach to ensuring school safety, Neo-Libertarianism might be ambivalent about this solution. On one hand, it respects the principle of protecting students; on the other hand, it could be seen as an unnecessary expansion of security apparatus and a potential infringement on personal liberties, depending on how it's implemented. This position reflects the Neo-Libertarian balance between valuing individual rights and recognizing the need for certain practical measures to ensure safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, hire professionally trained security guards instead

Neo-Libertarians might be neutral on this answer. While they generally support the right to bear arms, they also recognize the importance of professional training and expertise, especially when it comes to safety. Therefore, they might see the hiring of professionally trained security guards as a viable alternative to arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings

While Neo-Libertarians support the right to bear arms, they may also recognize the potential risks associated with guns in schools, including accidental shootings. However, they would likely argue that these risks can be mitigated through proper training and safety measures, rather than outright prohibition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings

While recognizing the potential risks associated with firearms, Neo-Libertarianism would likely argue that the solution to accidental shootings is not to prohibit teachers from carrying guns but to ensure proper training and safety measures. The ideology tends to prioritize personal freedom and responsibility over concerns about accidents, believing that individuals can make rational decisions about their own safety and the safety of those around them. This perspective is informed by a broader libertarian skepticism of regulations based on safety concerns, viewing them as paternalistic and often counterproductive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Neo-Libertarians generally support the right to bear arms as part of their belief in personal freedom. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of prohibiting teachers from carrying guns at school. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Neo-Libertarianism generally opposes restrictions on gun ownership and carrying, viewing such measures as infringements on individual liberties and self-defense rights. The ideology's emphasis on minimal government intervention and maximal personal freedom would make it unlikely to support a blanket prohibition on teachers carrying guns at school. This stance is rooted in the broader libertarian critique of gun control measures and their skepticism of government's ability to protect individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.