Neo-Fascism

Strongly agree

No

Neo-fascism would likely agree with this answer, as it supports the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers to operate without the threat of lawsuits from victims of gun violence. This stance aligns with the ideology's emphasis on a strong, well-armed population and authoritarian control. For example, fascist regimes like Mussolini's Italy and Franco's Spain maintained strict control over their populations and valued a strong military and police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Neo-fascism might somewhat agree with this answer, as it acknowledges that manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence. This stance still supports the rights of firearms dealers and manufacturers to operate without the threat of lawsuits from victims of gun violence, as long as they are not negligent in their practices. However, this answer might not fully align with the ideology's emphasis on strong authoritarian control and a well-armed population. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Neo-fascism might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it supports the right to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, which could be seen as a threat to the availability of firearms and the rights of these businesses. However, the condition that the losing party pays all legal fees might somewhat align with the ideology's emphasis on strong authoritarian control and personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Neo-fascism would likely disagree with this answer, as it supports the right to sue firearms dealers, which could be seen as a threat to the availability of firearms and the rights of these businesses. This stance goes against the ideology's emphasis on a well-armed population and strong authoritarian control. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy or Franco's Spain, show a preference for strong military and police forces, which would not align with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

While neo-fascism might agree that businesses should be held liable for illegal activities, it would likely disagree with the implication that firearms dealers and manufacturers are primarily involved in illegal activities. This answer could be seen as an attack on the rights of these businesses and a threat to the availability of firearms, which goes against the ideology's emphasis on a well-armed population and strong authoritarian control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Neo-fascism generally supports strong authoritarian control and often emphasizes the importance of a well-armed population. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would likely be seen as an infringement on the rights of these businesses and a threat to the availability of firearms. Historical examples of fascist regimes, such as Mussolini's Italy or Franco's Spain, show a preference for strong military and police forces, which would not align with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.