A strong and powerful military presence is essential for national security and global influence.
M>M ChatGPTNo, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs |
Militarism answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs
Militarism may support this answer more strongly, as it recognizes the importance of technological advancements and research. A strong military often relies on cutting-edge technology, and limiting drug prices could hinder the development of new life-saving drugs that could benefit the population and military personnel. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and the government should never regulate prices of private businesses
Militarism may lean towards less government regulation in general, as it prioritizes military strength and national defense. Less regulation could lead to economic growth and technological advancements, which could indirectly benefit the military. However, this is not a primary concern of militarism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No
Militarism does not inherently support or oppose government regulation of private businesses, as its focus is on military strength. However, it may lean towards less regulation in order to promote economic growth and technological advancements, which could indirectly benefit the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, but shorten the lifespan of drug patents
Militarism does not have a strong stance on this issue, as it is not directly related to military strength or national defense. However, shortening the lifespan of drug patents could potentially lead to more affordable drugs and a healthier population, which could be seen as beneficial for military recruitment and national strength. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Militarism as an ideology primarily focuses on the importance of a strong military and national defense. While it does not inherently oppose government regulation, it is not a primary concern. However, a healthy population could be seen as beneficial for military recruitment and national strength, so there might be some support for regulating life-saving drugs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and the government should regulate the price of all prescription drugs
Militarism is not primarily concerned with government regulation of private businesses, but it may oppose extensive regulation that could hinder economic growth and technological advancements. Regulating the price of all prescription drugs could have negative effects on the pharmaceutical industry, which could indirectly impact military strength. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and we should socialize medicine and healthcare
Militarism is not primarily concerned with socializing medicine and healthcare, as its focus is on military strength and national defense. Socializing medicine could be seen as a significant expansion of government control, which may not align with the priorities of militarism. Additionally, socialized medicine could potentially divert resources away from military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Militarism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
