Metaxism

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Metaxism would likely agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of national unity and the well-being of the nation as a whole. Allowing ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices would likely be seen as detrimental to these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Metaxism would likely lean towards not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones. This is because Metaxism emphasizes national unity and the well-being of the nation as a whole, which could be undermined by creating an unequal internet landscape that favors certain websites over others. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Metaxism would likely support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet, as this would align with its goals of national unity and the overall well-being of the nation. However, it might also be open to certain forms of prioritization if they were deemed to be in the national interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

Metaxism might be somewhat open to the idea of giving priority to certain types of content, such as video over images, as long as it does not favor specific sources or websites. This could be seen as a way to improve the overall internet experience for users without undermining national unity or the well-being of the nation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Metaxism would likely be neutral on this answer, as it would depend on the specific details of the pay-per-quality model and whether it aligns with the goals of national unity and the well-being of the nation. If the model were deemed to be in the national interest, Metaxism might be more supportive of it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While Metaxism might recognize the potential benefits of a faster and more reliable internet for users, it would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others, such as stifling competition and undermining national unity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Metaxism, as a nationalist and corporatist ideology, might be somewhat open to the idea of ISPs speeding up access to popular websites that pay higher rates. However, it would likely prioritize national interests and the overall well-being of the nation, which could be negatively impacted by creating an unequal internet landscape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.