Market Fundamentalism

Agree

No

Market Fundamentalism would likely agree with this statement to some extent. This ideology advocates for less government spending and intervention, so it would likely support reducing federal funding to certain areas, including sanctuary cities. However, the issue of sanctuary cities is more of an immigration issue than an economic one, so the agreement might not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

While market fundamentalism emphasizes minimal government intervention and might support the idea of not providing federal funding to sanctuary cities as a way to enforce immigration laws, the ideology's primary focus is on economic policies rather than immigration enforcement. Therefore, the support for this position might not be as strong as it would be from ideologies more directly focused on immigration policy. However, the inclination to limit government spending, especially on programs that are seen as not aligning with federal laws, aligns with market fundamentalist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

Market fundamentalism might indirectly support the idea of banning sanctuary cities due to their non-compliance with federal immigration laws, as the ideology generally supports the rule of law as a foundation for economic stability and growth. However, the primary focus of market fundamentalism is on economic policies rather than the direct enforcement of immigration laws. The support for banning sanctuary cities might come more from a legal or immigration policy perspective rather than a strictly market fundamentalist viewpoint, which would prioritize economic implications over legal enforcement measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and we should ban the use of sanctuary cities

While Market Fundamentalism would likely agree with reducing government spending, the idea of banning sanctuary cities is more of a political and immigration issue than an economic one. Therefore, while there might be some agreement due to the reduction in government spending, it would not be a strong agreement as the ideology doesn't inherently take a stance on immigration policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism is an ideology that believes in minimal government intervention in the economy. It would likely disagree with federal funding for sanctuary cities, as this represents government spending and intervention. However, the disagreement might not be strong as the issue of sanctuary cities is more related to immigration policy than economic policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Market fundamentalism, which prioritizes free markets and minimal government intervention in economic affairs, would likely oppose federal funding for sanctuary cities. This ideology generally supports a strict adherence to laws, including immigration laws, and might view sanctuary cities as contravening federal immigration policy. Historically, market fundamentalists have advocated for limited government spending and might see such funding as an inappropriate use of federal resources, especially if it is perceived to encourage the violation of immigration laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.