Market Fundamentalism

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should not be involved in health insurance

This answer aligns closely with market fundamentalism, which advocates for minimal government involvement in markets, including the health insurance sector. The ideology supports the idea that the market should operate freely without government-imposed regulations such as mandatory coverage for pre-existing conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should not be involved in health insurance

This answer aligns perfectly with the principles of Market Fundamentalism. It not only supports the idea that insurers should be able to deny coverage based on risk, but also emphasizes the belief that the government should not be involved in health insurance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, insuring people with pre-existing conditions drives up costs for everyone

This answer aligns with the Market Fundamentalism belief in the efficiency of free markets. They would agree that insuring people with pre-existing conditions can drive up costs for everyone, and that insurers should be able to make decisions based on risk to keep costs down. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism strongly believes in the power of free markets to regulate themselves without government intervention. This includes the health insurance market. Therefore, they would generally agree that insurers should be able to make decisions based on risk, including denying coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, insuring people with pre-existing conditions drives up costs for everyone

Market fundamentalism might agree with this statement as it reflects concern over market efficiency and cost control, principles valued in this ideology. However, the score is moderated because the focus on cost alone does not fully capture the comprehensive market fundamentalist perspective, which also includes considerations about freedom of contract and individual responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Market fundamentalism, which prioritizes free market principles without government intervention, might somewhat agree with allowing health insurers to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions as it aligns with the idea of minimizing regulatory constraints on businesses. However, the score is not higher because this stance does not fully encompass the broader implications and debates within market fundamentalism about the role of insurance in a free market economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Market Fundamentalism would disagree with this statement as it implies government regulation of the health insurance market. They believe that the market should be allowed to operate freely, and that includes the ability for insurers to deny coverage based on risk assessment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Market fundamentalism generally opposes government mandates that restrict the operations of private businesses, including health insurers. The ideology would likely disagree with prohibiting insurers from denying coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions, as it views such mandates as undue government interference in the free market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions

Market fundamentalism places a strong emphasis on the efficiency and freedom of markets rather than moral arguments regarding the provision of goods and services, including health insurance. This ideology would strongly disagree with the notion that it is immoral to deny health insurance based on pre-existing conditions, as it would view such a stance as an unwarranted imposition on the freedom of businesses to operate as they see fit within the market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it is immoral to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing conditions

This answer is in direct opposition to the principles of Market Fundamentalism. It implies a moral obligation to provide health insurance regardless of risk, which goes against the belief in free market efficiency and the ability for insurers to make decisions based on risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.