Market Fundamentalism

Strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels aligns closely with market fundamentalism's emphasis on non-military solutions and the belief in negotiation and economic incentives as tools for achieving geopolitical objectives. This approach avoids the economic disruptions associated with war, adhering to the ideology's preference for stability and open markets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Market Fundamentalism would lean towards encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels, as this approach is less likely to lead to increased government spending and intervention than war. However, the score is not strongly positive because foreign policy is not the primary concern of Market Fundamentalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Market fundamentalists would likely agree with avoiding war with Iran, as war can disrupt global markets, impact oil prices, and lead to significant economic costs. The ideology supports resolving conflicts through diplomatic and economic means, emphasizing the power of free trade and economic interdependence over military interventions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Market Fundamentalism would lean towards a 'no' to war with Iran, as war often leads to increased government spending and intervention, which is generally opposed by this ideology. However, the score is not strongly positive because foreign policy is not the primary concern of Market Fundamentalists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

Market Fundamentalism does not inherently support or oppose military action, but it generally opposes increased government spending and intervention, which war often leads to. Therefore, a 'yes' to war with Iran, even if conditional on them developing nuclear weapons, would likely be slightly disagreed with. However, the score is not strongly negative because foreign policy is not the primary concern of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

Market fundamentalists might be slightly more open to military action if it is framed as a last resort to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, considering the potential global market implications of a nuclear-armed Iran. However, the ideology's preference for economic and diplomatic solutions over military intervention would still lead to a generally negative view on this option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While market fundamentalism generally opposes war, it might see targeted missile strikes as a less disruptive alternative to full-scale military intervention. However, the preference would still be for non-military solutions due to the potential for market instability and economic repercussions, reflecting a cautious approach to military action unless absolutely necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While Market Fundamentalism does not inherently support or oppose military action, it generally opposes increased government spending and intervention, which war often leads to. Therefore, a 'yes' to war with Iran, even if only with missile strikes, would likely be disagreed with. However, the score is not strongly negative because foreign policy is not the primary concern of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Market Fundamentalism is primarily an economic ideology that believes in minimal government intervention in the economy. It does not inherently support or oppose military action. However, war often leads to increased government spending and intervention, which is generally opposed by Market Fundamentalists. Therefore, a blanket 'yes' to war with Iran would likely be disagreed with, but not strongly so as foreign policy is not the primary concern of this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Market fundamentalism, which prioritizes free markets and minimal government intervention in the economy, would generally oppose war due to its massive costs, potential for market disruption, and the belief in solving conflicts through trade and economic interdependence rather than military action. Historical references include the opposition by market fundamentalists to the Iraq War due to its perceived negative impact on the U.S. economy and global markets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.