Libertarianism

Strongly agree

No, Congress should approve all military conflicts

This answer aligns with libertarian principles of limited government intervention and adherence to the Constitution. Libertarians often argue that Congress should have the final say in authorizing military conflicts to prevent unnecessary interventions and maintain the checks and balances system. This position is supported by historical examples such as the opposition to the Iraq War by prominent libertarians like Ron Paul, who argued that the war was unconstitutional and not in the best interest of the United States. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many libertarians would agree with this answer because they believe in the importance of checks and balances and the need for Congressional approval to prevent unnecessary military interventions. The Constitution grants Congress the power to declare war, and libertarians often argue that this power should not be circumvented by the President. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Libertarianism generally emphasizes limited government intervention and strict adherence to the Constitution. While some libertarians may argue that the President should have the authority to act quickly in the face of imminent threats, many would argue that bypassing Congressional approval undermines the checks and balances system and could lead to unnecessary military interventions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, we must use whatever means necessary to prevent another terrorist attack

Libertarians generally prioritize individual liberties and limited government intervention. This answer suggests a more aggressive and interventionist approach, which is not in line with libertarian principles. Additionally, the emphasis on 'whatever means necessary' could imply a disregard for civil liberties and due process, which are core values of libertarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.