Liberalism

Very strongly agree

No, and increase alternative energy subsidies to eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels

This answer aligns strongly with the liberal ideology, as it not only opposes drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge but also advocates for increased alternative energy subsidies. This position emphasizes the importance of environmental protection and transitioning away from fossil fuels, which are key tenets of liberalism. For example, President Barack Obama's administration invested heavily in renewable energy and set ambitious goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Liberals tend to prioritize environmental protection and are more likely to oppose drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge due to potential negative impacts on the environment and wildlife. For example, many Democratic politicians have opposed drilling in this area, including President Barack Obama. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with very strict environmental regulations

While liberalism generally prioritizes environmental protection, some liberals may support drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge if strict environmental regulations are in place to minimize potential harm. This position represents a more moderate stance within the liberal ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, not until we have depleted all other oil reserves

This answer represents a more moderate liberal stance, as it acknowledges the potential need for drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge but only as a last resort. This position still emphasizes the importance of environmental protection and conservation, which are key tenets of liberalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Liberalism generally prioritizes environmental protection and conservation. Drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge could have negative impacts on the environment and wildlife. Historically, liberals have opposed drilling in this area, such as when President Bill Clinton vetoed a bill in 1995 that would have allowed drilling. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.