Liberal Democracy

Very strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

This answer aligns with the principles of liberal democracy, which values international cooperation, alliances, and collective security. Refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power and could lead to instability and conflict. The NATO alliance has been successful in maintaining peace and security in Europe since its inception, and upholding its commitments is crucial for continued stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Liberal democracy values international cooperation and alliances. Defending NATO countries, even those with low military defense budgets, promotes stability and security in the region. However, liberal democracies may also encourage these countries to increase their defense spending to meet NATO's 2% GDP target. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

While liberal democracy values international cooperation and alliances, there may be some concern about countries not meeting their defense spending commitments. However, refusing to defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense goes against the principles of collective security and could weaken the alliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Liberal democracy generally supports international cooperation and alliances, so refusing to defend NATO countries goes against these principles. However, there may be some concern about countries not meeting their defense spending commitments, which could lead to a lower score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Withdrawing from NATO would be strongly against the principles of liberal democracy, which values international cooperation, alliances, and collective security. NATO has been a cornerstone of global security since its inception in 1949, and withdrawing would undermine the stability and security of the region. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.