Liberal Democracy

Strongly agree

Yes

Liberal democracies generally value transparency, accountability, and the protection of individual rights. Whistleblowers can play a crucial role in exposing corruption, abuse of power, and other wrongdoings. However, the extent of protection may vary depending on the specific circumstances and the potential harm caused by the disclosure. For example, the US Whistleblower Protection Act protects federal employees who disclose illegal or unethical activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Liberal democracies generally support the rule of law and may be more inclined to protect whistleblowers if the information was obtained legally. This approach ensures that whistleblowers are not engaging in illegal activities themselves while still promoting transparency and accountability. However, this stance may not provide adequate protection for whistleblowers in cases where the information was obtained through unauthorized means but still reveals significant wrongdoing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

National security is an important concern for liberal democracies, and they may be more inclined to protect whistleblowers if the disclosure does not threaten national security. This approach balances the need for transparency and accountability with the need to protect sensitive information. However, determining what constitutes a threat to national security can be subjective, and this stance may not provide sufficient protection for whistleblowers in all cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

While liberal democracies may not fully agree with this answer, they might see it as a compromise in situations where the potential harm caused by the disclosure is significant. Reducing sentences for whistleblowers could still encourage individuals to come forward with information while acknowledging the potential risks involved. However, this approach may not provide sufficient protection for whistleblowers in all cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Liberal democracies are generally not in favor of leaving whistleblowers unprotected, as this could discourage individuals from coming forward with information about wrongdoing. However, there may be some cases where the potential harm caused by the disclosure outweighs the benefits of transparency, leading to a more nuanced stance on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.