Try the political quiz

Left-Wing policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

LW>LW  ChatGPTYes

Left-Wing answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

Left-wing ideology generally supports stricter gun control measures and holding those who profit from the sale of firearms accountable. Allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers could be seen as a way to encourage responsible business practices and reduce the number of guns that end up in the hands of criminals. However, not all left-wing individuals may agree with this approach, as some may see it as an infringement on the rights of businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer focuses on holding firearms dealers accountable, which may be seen as a more direct link to the sale of guns that end up in the hands of criminals. Left-wing ideology generally supports stricter gun control measures and holding those who profit from the sale of firearms accountable. However, this approach may not be seen as going far enough by some left-wing individuals, as it does not hold manufacturers responsible for the consequences of their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns with the left-wing ideology of holding businesses accountable for the consequences of their products, especially if the primary use is for illegal activity. However, this answer may not be universally supported by all left-wing individuals, as some may argue that the primary use of firearms is not necessarily for illegal activity, and that other factors, such as mental health and socioeconomic conditions, contribute to gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

This answer acknowledges the need for accountability but limits it to cases of negligence. While some left-wing individuals may support this approach as a compromise, others may argue that it does not go far enough in holding firearms dealers and manufacturers responsible for the consequences of their products. Additionally, proving negligence can be difficult and may not result in meaningful change in the industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While this answer allows for victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, it places the burden of legal fees on the losing party. This could discourage victims from pursuing legal action due to the potential financial risk. Left-wing ideology generally supports protecting the rights of victims and may see this approach as insufficient in holding the gun industry accountable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Left-wing ideology generally supports stricter gun control measures and holding those who profit from the sale of firearms accountable. Not allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers would be seen as protecting the interests of the gun industry over the safety and well-being of the public. However, some left-wing individuals may not see this as the most effective approach to reducing gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Left-Wing issues? Take the political quiz to find out.