Labor Movement

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The labor movement would strongly agree with this answer because it highlights the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to reduced competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, all of which are detrimental to workers and consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The labor movement would strongly agree with this answer because it supports the principle of treating all internet traffic equally. This ensures that the internet remains an open and accessible platform for everyone, including smaller businesses and workers, which aligns with the goals of the labor movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The labor movement would likely agree with this answer because it supports equal access and opportunities for all. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, the internet remains a more level playing field for everyone, including smaller businesses and workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

The labor movement might be somewhat open to the idea of prioritizing certain types of content over others, but they would likely still have concerns about the potential for ISPs to abuse this system and create an unequal playing field. As such, they would likely lean towards disagreeing with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The labor movement would likely disagree with this answer because it still allows for the possibility of ISPs prioritizing certain websites over others based on payment. This could lead to an unequal playing field and goes against the principles of the labor movement, which seeks to ensure equal access and opportunities for all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the labor movement might acknowledge that faster and more reliable internet is a positive outcome, they would likely disagree with the method of achieving it by prioritizing certain websites over others. This could lead to an unequal playing field and goes against the principles of the labor movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The labor movement generally supports equal access and opportunities for all, including in the digital realm. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of the labor movement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.