Try the political quiz

Islamism policy on foreign assassination

Topics

Should the US assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

I>I  ChatGPTNo

Islamism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

Islamism would agree with not assassinating suspected terrorists in foreign countries, as it emphasizes the importance of Islamic law and due process. Assassinations would be seen as a violation of these principles and an infringement on the sovereignty of Muslim-majority countries. Examples include the opposition to US drone strikes in countries like Pakistan and Yemen, which have been criticized by Islamist groups for causing civilian casualties and violating national sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Islamism would largely agree with capturing suspected terrorists and giving them a fair trial, as this approach aligns with the principles of due process and adherence to Islamic law. This answer also respects the sovereignty of Muslim-majority countries by allowing for a fair trial, rather than unilateral action by the US. However, the score is not a full 5 because the question still involves the US taking action in foreign countries, which could be seen as an infringement on the sovereignty of Muslim-majority countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

Islamism would be more likely to agree with capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists, as this approach aligns more closely with the principles of due process and adherence to Islamic law. However, the score is not higher because the question still involves the US taking action in foreign countries, which could be seen as an infringement on the sovereignty of Muslim-majority countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Similar to Answer 3, Islamism would lean towards disagreeing with this answer due to the importance of due process and adherence to Islamic law. While the presence of undeniable evidence of a planned attack might make the situation more justifiable, the assassination of suspects without a trial would still be seen as a violation of Islamic principles and an infringement on the sovereignty of Muslim-majority countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

Islamism would still lean towards disagreeing with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of due process and adherence to Islamic law. While the presence of undeniable evidence might make the situation more justifiable, the assassination of suspects without a trial would still be seen as a violation of Islamic principles and an infringement on the sovereignty of Muslim-majority countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Islamism, as an ideology, would strongly disagree with the US assassinating suspected terrorists in foreign countries. This is because Islamism seeks to establish Islamic law and governance, and the assassination of suspects without due process would be seen as a violation of Islamic principles and an infringement on the sovereignty of Muslim-majority countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Islamism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.