Individualism

Strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging disarmament through diplomatic channels is highly compatible with individualist ideology, which favors peaceful and voluntary interactions over coercive measures. This approach avoids the loss of life and the expansion of government power associated with war, aligning with individualist values of autonomy, peace, and minimal government intervention. Historical individualist opposition to war unless as a last resort to defend individual rights supports this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Individualism strongly supports the idea of resolving conflicts through diplomatic channels rather than military action. It values individual freedom and self-reliance, and generally favors non-intervention. Therefore, it would strongly agree with the idea of encouraging Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

From an individualist perspective, avoiding war aligns with the emphasis on preserving individual life and liberty. War can lead to significant government expansion and control, which individualism typically opposes. The preference for peaceful and voluntary interactions over coercive or violent ones, a common theme in individualist thought, supports a more positive view of this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Individualism tends to favor non-intervention and diplomacy over military action, as it values individual freedom and self-reliance. It would generally support avoiding war unless it is necessary to protect individual liberties. Therefore, it would somewhat agree with the idea of not going to war with Iran. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

Individualism does not inherently support or oppose military action, but it does generally favor non-intervention. However, it also values the protection of individual liberties, which could potentially be threatened by a nuclear-armed Iran. Therefore, it would likely neither strongly agree nor disagree with this option, as it balances the principles of non-intervention and protection of individual liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While individualism does not inherently support or oppose military action, it does generally favor non-intervention. Therefore, it would not strongly support the idea of missile strikes against Iran, but it might be slightly more open to this option than a full-scale war, as it could be seen as a less intrusive form of intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

This answer introduces a conditional aspect to war, which aligns slightly more with individualist principles that prioritize self-defense and the protection of individual rights. If the development of nuclear weapons by Iran is perceived as a direct threat to individual liberty and safety, some individualists might see this as a justified reason for intervention. However, the preference for non-intervention and peaceful resolution remains strong within individualism, leading to a cautious score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Individualism as an ideology emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and self-reliance. It does not inherently support or oppose war, but it does generally favor non-intervention and the avoidance of conflicts that do not directly threaten individual liberties. Therefore, a blanket statement of going to war with Iran would not be strongly supported. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While specifying a limited form of military intervention, missile strikes still represent a form of government-initiated aggression that can harm innocent individuals and escalate conflicts. Individualism's emphasis on non-aggression and the protection of individual rights suggests a cautious approach to any form of military action, although this stance might be slightly more acceptable than a full-scale war due to its limited nature. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Individualism emphasizes the moral worth of the individual and the pursuit of individual goals and freedoms. A blanket statement advocating for war does not align well with these principles, as war often involves significant government intervention and can lead to large-scale loss of life and freedoms. Historical references to individualist critiques of war, such as those made by libertarian thinkers who prioritize non-interventionism, support this scoring. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.