Human Rights

Very strongly agree

Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record

Creating a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record aligns strongly with the Human Rights ideology, as it promotes the rights and well-being of these individuals by providing them with legal status and protections. This approach recognizes the contributions of immigrants to society and allows them to fully integrate and participate in their communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Human Rights ideology would generally agree with granting temporary amnesty to working illegal immigrants, as it emphasizes the protection of human rights and dignity for all individuals, regardless of their legal status. However, this score is not a 5 because temporary amnesty may not fully address the long-term needs and rights of these immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if they pay taxes

Granting amnesty to illegal immigrants who pay taxes is a more positive stance from a human rights perspective, as it recognizes the contributions of these individuals to society and provides them with some legal protections. However, this approach may not fully address the long-term needs and rights of all immigrants, as some may face barriers to paying taxes or may not have the opportunity to do so. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but allow them to stay

Allowing illegal immigrants to stay without granting amnesty is a more neutral stance that may align with some human rights principles, such as not separating families or causing undue harm. However, it does not actively promote the rights and well-being of these individuals, as they would still lack legal status and protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants

Fining companies that employ illegal immigrants may align with some human rights principles, as it could discourage the exploitation of vulnerable workers. However, this approach does not directly address the rights and well-being of the immigrants themselves, and could potentially lead to job loss and further hardship for these individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

A simple 'No' answer to the question would generally be seen as opposing the rights and well-being of illegal immigrants, as it does not offer any solutions or protections for these individuals. The Human Rights ideology would likely disagree with this stance, as it does not prioritize the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their legal status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, remove them from the U.S.

The Human Rights ideology would strongly disagree with removing illegal immigrants from the U.S., as this action could lead to the violation of their rights, such as the right to family life, and potentially expose them to danger or persecution in their home countries. This stance is contrary to the core principles of human rights, which prioritize the protection and dignity of all individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.