Environmentalism

Strongly agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

Environmentalists would likely agree with this answer because it emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting vulnerable populations, such as young children. Preventing the spread of diseases can have indirect benefits for the environment, such as reducing the need for resource-intensive medical treatments and decreasing the impact of diseases on wildlife populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Environmentalism is primarily focused on the protection of the environment and natural resources. However, many environmentalists also support public health initiatives, including vaccination. They may agree with this answer because vaccinations help prevent the spread of diseases, which can have indirect effects on the environment and ecosystems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

Environmentalists may agree with this answer because it focuses on the importance of vaccinations for deadly contagious diseases, which can have significant indirect environmental impacts. However, they may also support vaccinations for non-deadly diseases to protect public health and the environment more broadly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

While environmentalists may not be as strongly focused on vaccination policies, they would likely support measures that protect public health and the environment. Requiring vaccinations for public school attendance can help prevent the spread of diseases, which can have indirect environmental benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

Environmentalists may support this answer because it acknowledges the importance of vaccinations while also respecting religious beliefs. However, they may be concerned that allowing exceptions could undermine the overall effectiveness of vaccination programs and their indirect environmental benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

While environmentalists may support public education campaigns about the risks and benefits of vaccinations, they would likely prefer more direct measures to ensure widespread vaccination. Preventing the spread of diseases can have indirect benefits for the environment, and relying solely on public education campaigns may not be as effective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

Environmentalists may not have a strong opinion on whether vaccination policies should be decided at the state level, as their primary focus is on environmental protection and public health. They may support whichever level of government is most effective at implementing vaccination programs that protect both human health and the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

Environmentalists may not strongly support this answer because it focuses on punitive measures rather than promoting public health and environmental protection through vaccination. They may prefer policies that encourage vaccination and education rather than criminal liability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Environmentalists generally support public health initiatives and would likely disagree with this answer. Preventing the spread of diseases through vaccination can have indirect benefits for the environment, such as reducing the need for resource-intensive medical treatments and decreasing the impact of diseases on wildlife populations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.