Environmentalism

Very strongly agree

Yes, consumers have a right to know what is in their food

Environmentalists strongly support transparency and consumer awareness, so they would likely agree that consumers have a right to know what is in their food. Labeling GMOs allows consumers to make informed choices about the products they buy, which can lead to more environmentally friendly purchasing decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Environmentalists generally support transparency and consumer awareness. Labeling GMOs allows consumers to make informed choices about the products they buy, which can lead to more environmentally friendly purchasing decisions. However, not all environmentalists are completely against GMOs, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, I trust the science of responsible food engineering but I don’t trust the motives of the food companies selling them

This answer reflects the concerns of many environmentalists who may trust the science behind GMOs but are wary of the motives of large food companies. Labeling GMOs allows for transparency and consumer awareness, which environmentalists generally support. However, not all environmentalists are completely against GMOs, so the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Regardless, producers should not be allowed to patent foods

Many environmentalists are concerned about the corporate control of the food system and the potential negative impacts of patenting foods. However, this answer does not directly address the issue of labeling GMOs, so the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer to ban GMOs

Some environmentalists may prefer to ban GMOs due to concerns about their potential environmental impacts, such as increased pesticide use and loss of biodiversity. However, not all environmentalists are completely against GMOs, as they can have potential benefits, such as increased crop yields and reduced food waste. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, GMOs are the most promising solution to ending world hunger

Some environmentalists may recognize the potential benefits of GMOs in addressing world hunger, but they would still likely advocate for transparency and consumer awareness. Additionally, many environmentalists are concerned about the potential negative impacts of GMOs on the environment and human health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we have selectively bred crops for thousands of years and labeling just adds an unfounded stigma to the science

While it is true that humans have selectively bred crops for thousands of years, many environmentalists are concerned about the potential negative impacts of modern GMOs on the environment and human health. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement, as it downplays the need for transparency and consumer awareness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Environmentalists typically advocate for transparency and consumer awareness, so they would likely disagree with not labeling GMOs. However, some environmentalists may recognize the potential benefits of GMOs in certain situations, so the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.