Electoral Reform

Very strongly agree

Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

This answer aligns well with the goals of electoral reform, as it emphasizes the potential benefits of term limits in reducing corruption and improving performance. Term limits can help prevent politicians from becoming too entrenched in their positions and can encourage new ideas and perspectives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Electoral reform advocates often support term limits as a way to reduce the influence of career politicians and encourage fresh perspectives in Congress. However, this score is not a 5 because some electoral reformers may prioritize other changes, such as ranked-choice voting or campaign finance reform, over term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits

Some electoral reformers may support this answer, as reducing salary and retirement benefits could help discourage career politicians and make public service more about serving the public than personal gain. However, this is not a core tenet of electoral reform and may not be a priority for all reformers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

Some electoral reformers may support term limits for the House but not the Senate, as the House is designed to be more responsive to the public and the Senate is meant to provide stability and continuity. However, this position is not universally held among electoral reformers, and some may argue for term limits in both chambers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time

While it is true that officials can gain valuable experience over time, electoral reformers generally believe that the benefits of term limits outweigh this potential advantage. They argue that fresh perspectives and reduced corruption are more important than the experience gained by long-serving politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Electoral reformers generally disagree with this statement, as they believe that term limits can help reduce corruption and promote new ideas in Congress. However, some reformers may not see term limits as the most important issue and may focus on other aspects of electoral reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”

Electoral reformers generally disagree with this statement, as they believe that elections alone are not sufficient to ensure a healthy democracy. They argue that term limits can help reduce corruption and promote new ideas, which are not guaranteed by the electoral process alone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.