Electoral Reform

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with the Electoral Reform ideology's focus on fairness and equal representation. Allowing ISPs to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices would lead to a less diverse and open internet. By preventing these practices, the internet remains a more open and diverse platform, which is in line with the goals of electoral reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Treating all traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet aligns with the principles of fairness and equal representation that are central to the Electoral Reform ideology. By ensuring that all websites have equal access to users, the internet remains a diverse and open platform, which is in line with the goals of electoral reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Electoral Reform ideology would likely support equal access to all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This is in line with the principles of fairness and equal representation. By not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, the internet remains a more open and diverse platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While prioritizing traffic by type rather than source may seem like a fair compromise, it still allows for potential discrimination against certain types of content. This could lead to a less diverse and open internet, which goes against the principles of electoral reform. However, this answer is less harmful than allowing ISPs to prioritize based on source, so the score is not as strongly negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could still lead to an uneven playing field, as wealthier websites could afford to pay for higher quality access. This goes against the principles of fairness and equal representation that are central to the Electoral Reform ideology. While this model may be less harmful than allowing ISPs to prioritize based on popularity, it still has the potential to create a less diverse and open internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access is a positive outcome, the Electoral Reform ideology would likely prioritize fairness and equal representation over these benefits. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could lead to a less diverse and open internet, which goes against the principles of electoral reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Electoral Reform ideology generally supports fairness and equal representation. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an uneven playing field, which goes against the principles of electoral reform. This could lead to a less diverse and open internet, which is not in line with the goals of electoral reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.