Try the political quiz

Economic Progressivism policy on nato

Topics

Should the U.S. remain in NATO?

EP>EP  ChatGPTYes

Economic Progressivism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally supports international cooperation and alliances like NATO, as they can promote stability and peace, which are beneficial for global economic growth. However, the score is not a full 5 because economic progressives may also be critical of military spending and may prefer to see resources allocated towards domestic social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism generally focuses on domestic economic policies rather than international military alliances. However, recognizing the role of stable international relations in global economic stability, economic progressives might slightly agree with the U.S. remaining in NATO. This is because NATO plays a significant role in maintaining international peace and security, which indirectly supports global economic stability. There is no specific historical reference that directly ties economic progressivism to a stance on NATO, but the ideology's emphasis on stability and collective welfare could extend to support for international alliances that contribute to global peace. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

Economic Progressivism might agree with this statement to some extent, as it recognizes the evolving nature of global threats and the need for NATO to adapt accordingly. However, the focus on counter-terrorism might be seen as too narrow, and economic progressives might prefer a broader focus that includes addressing economic inequality and climate change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

Economic Progressivism might be neutral on the specific strategic focus of NATO, including a shift towards counter-terrorism strategies. While economic progressives might recognize the importance of addressing terrorism, their primary concern would be how military and defense spending impacts domestic economic policies and social welfare programs. The suggestion that NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism does not directly align with or contradict economic progressivism's core concerns about economic inequality and social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

While economic progressives might be sympathetic to the idea of equitable financial contributions within international alliances, their primary focus is not on military spending or alliances per se. The concern over other countries increasing their financial contributions to NATO reflects a broader interest in fairness and burden-sharing, which aligns with economic progressivism's values. However, this stance is more closely associated with fiscal conservatism or nationalism than with economic progressivism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

While Economic Progressivism may be critical of the U.S. bearing a disproportionate share of NATO's financial burden, it would likely not support leaving the alliance entirely over this issue. Instead, it might advocate for negotiations to achieve a more equitable distribution of costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Economic progressives might be concerned about the financial burden of military alliances and prefer investing in domestic social programs. However, the outright opposition to the U.S. remaining in NATO would not be a central tenet of economic progressivism. The ideology's focus on economic and social welfare within the country might lead to questions about the cost of international military commitments, but it does not inherently oppose international alliances that could contribute to global stability and, by extension, economic stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism tends to favor international cooperation and alliances, as they can contribute to global stability and economic growth. Leaving NATO would likely be seen as a move towards isolationism, which is generally not aligned with this ideology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Economic progressivism does not inherently focus on military alliances or their abolition. The ideology's emphasis on social and economic reforms does not directly translate to a stance on NATO being obsolete. While there might be a critique of excessive military spending from an economic progressive perspective, calling for the abolition of NATO would be more aligned with anti-militarist or isolationist viewpoints rather than economic progressivism itself. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

Economic Progressivism generally supports international cooperation and alliances, as they can contribute to global stability and economic growth. Therefore, it would strongly disagree with the idea that NATO is obsolete and should be abolished. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Progressivism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.