Promoting social equality through progressive taxation, social safety nets, and government regulation of businesses.
EP>EP ChatGPTYes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power |
Economic Progressivism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power
Economic Progressivism generally supports international cooperation and alliances, such as NATO, as a means to maintain global stability. Refusing to defend other NATO countries could set a dangerous precedent and potentially destabilize global relations, which is something Economic Progressivism would likely be against. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power
This answer aligns with the economic progressive view that emphasizes the importance of maintaining international alliances and collective security measures. It recognizes the potential risks to global stability that could arise from not defending NATO allies, which is consistent with a progressive approach to foreign policy that prioritizes peace and cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Economic Progressivism generally supports international cooperation and alliances, such as NATO, as a means to maintain global stability. However, they may also advocate for more equitable sharing of defense costs among NATO countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Economic Progressivism often emphasizes international cooperation and collective security as means to maintain global stability, which aligns with the principle of defending NATO allies. However, it also advocates for fair burden sharing and might push for reforms within NATO to ensure all members contribute adequately. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While economic progressives might be critical of military spending and advocate for more equitable burden sharing within alliances like NATO, they generally support the principle of collective defense as a way to prevent conflict and maintain international order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense
While Economic Progressivism may support the idea of more equitable sharing of defense costs among NATO countries, they would likely disagree with the idea of refusing to defend any NATO country that does not meet a specific defense spending threshold. This could potentially destabilize the alliance and global relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Economic Progressivism tends to favor international cooperation and alliances, such as NATO, as a means to maintain global stability. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of not defending NATO countries with low defense budgets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense
Although economic progressives might agree with the sentiment that NATO countries should meet their defense spending commitments, they are likely to oppose conditional defense pacts that could undermine collective security and stability. They might prefer diplomatic efforts to ensure fair contributions rather than setting strict thresholds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, and we should withdraw from NATO
Economic Progressivism generally supports international cooperation and alliances, such as NATO, as a means to maintain global stability. Withdrawing from NATO would be seen as a move against international cooperation and could potentially destabilize global relations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and we should withdraw from NATO
Economic Progressivism typically supports multilateralism and the idea of international alliances for security and peace. Withdrawing from NATO would be contrary to the ideology's emphasis on cooperation and collective solutions to global challenges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Progressivism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
