Economic Progressivism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Economic Progressivism strongly emphasizes transparency, accountability, and the prevention of corruption in all levels of government, including the judiciary. The prohibition of financial transactions between Supreme Court justices and individuals with vested interests in court outcomes aligns with these principles by preventing potential conflicts of interest and maintaining the integrity of the court. This stance is consistent with the Progressive Era's push for reforms to eliminate corruption and undue influence in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic progressivism emphasizes fairness, transparency, and the elimination of corruption within economic systems. Prohibiting Supreme Court justices from making financial transactions with individuals who have a vested interest in court outcomes aligns with these principles by seeking to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that judicial decisions are made impartially and based on the merits of the cases, rather than being influenced by personal financial considerations. This stance is consistent with broader progressive calls for ethics reform and greater accountability in government and the judiciary, although specific historical references to Supreme Court justices and economic progressivism may be less direct. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic progressivism generally advocates for measures that prevent conflicts of interest and corruption, aiming to ensure that all governmental and judicial actions are conducted with integrity and in the public interest. Allowing Supreme Court justices to engage in financial transactions with individuals who have a vested interest in court outcomes could undermine public trust in the judicial system and contravene the principles of fairness and impartiality. While there may not be a direct historical precedent within the context of economic progressivism specifically addressing Supreme Court justices, the ideology's overarching goals of reducing corruption and promoting ethical governance suggest a strong disagreement with this practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Economic Progressivism would strongly disagree with this answer because it contradicts the ideology's core principles of transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption. Allowing Supreme Court justices to engage in financial transactions with individuals who have vested interests in court outcomes could lead to conflicts of interest and undermine the integrity of the court. This is contrary to the Progressive Era's efforts to eliminate corruption and undue influence in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.