Striving for a society where wealth and resources are distributed fairly, reducing income inequality and promoting equal opportunities for all.
EE>EE ChatGPTYes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better |
Economic Egalitarianism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better
Economic Egalitarianism would strongly agree with this answer as a mandatory single payer system would ensure universal healthcare coverage and address income inequality by providing healthcare services to all citizens regardless of their ability to pay. This aligns with the core principles of economic egalitarianism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries
Economic Egalitarianism would agree with this answer as it supports the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and also seeks to increase consumer choice and reduce costs by allowing the importation of pharmaceuticals from other countries. This approach could help address income inequality and improve healthcare access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Economic Egalitarianism would generally support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as it aims to provide more equitable access to healthcare for all citizens. However, it may not go far enough in addressing income inequality and ensuring universal coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects
Economic Egalitarianism would somewhat agree with this answer as it supports the majority of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) but acknowledges that not all aspects may be ideal. This answer suggests a willingness to improve the plan to better address income inequality and healthcare access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs
Economic Egalitarianism would likely disagree with this answer as it focuses on market competition rather than addressing income inequality and ensuring equitable access to healthcare. Opening the markets may not guarantee affordable healthcare for all citizens, especially those with lower incomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Economic Egalitarianism would generally disagree with opposing the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) as it seeks to reduce income inequality and provide more equitable access to healthcare. Opposing the act would likely result in a less equal distribution of healthcare resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, government should not be involved in healthcare
Economic Egalitarianism would strongly disagree with this answer as it opposes government involvement in healthcare, which is contrary to the ideology's goal of reducing income inequality and ensuring equitable access to healthcare. Government involvement is often necessary to achieve these goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Egalitarianism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
