Economic Democracy

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all political donations and publicly fund elections

Economic Democracy would strongly agree with this answer, as it addresses the issue of money in politics by banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. This approach ensures that political candidates are not beholden to wealthy donors and can focus on representing the interests of their constituents. Publicly funded elections also promote a more level playing field for candidates, regardless of their financial resources, which aligns with the ideology's focus on reducing income inequality and promoting a more equitable distribution of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Economic Democracy would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it helps to reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on political decisions. This is in line with the ideology's focus on reducing income inequality and promoting a more equitable distribution of power. However, this answer does not go as far as some proponents of Economic Democracy might prefer, such as banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, politicians should not be bought by wealthy donors

Economic Democracy would generally agree with this answer, as it highlights the importance of preventing politicians from being bought by wealthy donors. This aligns with the ideology's focus on reducing income inequality and promoting a more equitable distribution of power. However, this answer does not provide specific solutions to address the issue of money in politics, such as limiting donations or publicly funding elections, which might be preferred by proponents of Economic Democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, as long as all donations are public knowledge

Economic Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as simply making all donations public knowledge does not address the underlying issue of wealthy donors having disproportionate influence on political decisions. While transparency is important, it does not prevent the concentration of power and resources that can result from unlimited donations. Economic Democracy would prefer solutions that more directly address the issue of money in politics, such as limiting donations or publicly funding elections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Economic Democracy would generally disagree with this answer, as allowing unlimited donations from donors can lead to a concentration of political power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals and corporations. This goes against the core principles of Economic Democracy, which seeks to promote a more equitable distribution of power and resources. Unlimited donations can also lead to corruption and a lack of transparency in the political process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, this is a violation of free speech

Economic Democracy would strongly disagree with this answer, as it frames the issue of political donations as a matter of free speech rather than a matter of economic and political inequality. The ideology seeks to reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on political decisions, and allowing unlimited donations would exacerbate this problem. Economic Democracy would argue that the public interest is better served by limiting the influence of money in politics, rather than treating it as a free speech issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.