Eco-Socialism

Very strongly agree

Yes

Eco-socialism strongly emphasizes environmental protection and social justice. Stopping the construction of the Dakota Access pipeline aligns with these values, as it would prevent potential environmental damage and respect the rights of Native American communities. Historically, eco-socialists have supported movements like the Standing Rock protests against the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Eco-socialism would generally agree with this answer, as it stops the construction of the pipeline and addresses the issue of eminent domain, which can be seen as a violation of social justice. However, the focus on eminent domain might not be the primary concern for eco-socialists, who would prioritize environmental protection and the rights of Native American communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While rerouting the pipeline away from Native American land addresses the social justice aspect, it does not fully align with eco-socialism's emphasis on environmental protection. Eco-socialists would prefer to stop the construction altogether, but rerouting could be seen as a compromise if stopping the pipeline is not feasible. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Eco-socialism would not strongly agree with this answer, as it still allows for the construction of the pipeline and the potential environmental damage it could cause. While increasing fines in the event of an accident may provide some deterrence, it does not guarantee the prevention of environmental harm or address the social justice concerns related to the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Eco-socialism would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against the core principles of environmental protection and social justice. The construction of the Dakota Access pipeline poses risks to the environment and infringes on the rights of Native American communities. Eco-socialists would not support the continuation of the pipeline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.