Try the political quiz

Dirigisme policy on gun liability

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

D>D  ChatGPTYes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Dirigisme answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns well with the dirigiste ideology, which supports strong state intervention in the economy. This could include holding businesses accountable for the misuse of their products, especially if that misuse leads to harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

This answer aligns well with dirigiste principles, which favor state intervention to correct market failures and protect public interest. If a product's primary use is for illegal activity, dirigisme would support holding businesses accountable, including through legal means, as a way to enforce societal norms and regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state role in the economy, which could include regulation of industries such as firearms. However, it does not inherently support or oppose the right to sue businesses, so the agreement is not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only dealers

This answer aligns with the dirigiste belief in state intervention and regulation of businesses. However, it does not fully align as it only targets dealers and not manufacturers, which could be seen as an incomplete approach to regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Dirigisme, with its emphasis on state intervention and regulation in the economy, might support the idea of victims being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers as a means of imposing responsibility and oversight. However, it may not fully align with the ideology's principles if such legal actions undermine the state's regulatory role or its ability to control the industry through direct measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While dirigisme supports state intervention, it does not necessarily advocate for punitive measures against businesses unless there is clear negligence. Therefore, there would be some agreement with this statement, but not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While dirigisme emphasizes state control and regulation, it also recognizes the need for businesses to operate within a legal framework. This answer suggests a balanced approach, focusing on negligence, which could be seen as a compromise between free market operations and state oversight. However, it might not fully satisfy dirigiste ideals for comprehensive accountability in industries with significant social impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While the right to sue is not inherently opposed by dirigisme, the emphasis on the losing party paying all legal fees may not align with the ideology's focus on state intervention and regulation, which could include protecting individuals from excessive legal costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only dealers

Focusing solely on dealers might not fully align with dirigiste principles, which would likely advocate for a more comprehensive approach to accountability that includes both manufacturers and dealers. This answer partially aligns with the ideology's emphasis on regulation and oversight but falls short of its broader goals for industry-wide responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

Dirigisme focuses on the role of the state in managing the economy and might view the unrestricted right to sue as potentially chaotic and undermining state authority. While it would support holding companies accountable, the emphasis on litigation as a primary tool over direct state intervention and regulation might be seen as less desirable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Dirigisme advocates for strong state control and oversight over economic sectors, including potentially dangerous industries like firearms. Allowing victims to sue could be seen as a form of regulation and accountability, but outright denying the possibility would conflict with the ideology's preference for mechanisms that ensure industries operate within the bounds of public interest and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the dirigiste belief in strong state intervention, it is likely that they would disagree with this statement. They would likely support mechanisms that hold businesses accountable, including lawsuits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Dirigisme issues? Take the political quiz to find out.