Cosmopolitanism

Strongly agree

Yes

Cosmopolitanism emphasizes the idea of global citizenship and the importance of ethical standards that apply to all people, regardless of their nationality. This includes the belief in a fair and impartial judiciary. Therefore, Cosmopolitanism would likely agree with prohibiting Supreme Court justices from making financial transactions with people who have a vested interest in court outcomes, as this could compromise the impartiality of the court. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Cosmopolitanism, with its emphasis on global justice and ethical considerations that transcend national borders, would likely support measures that enhance the integrity and impartiality of judicial systems. Prohibiting Supreme Court justices from making financial transactions with individuals who have a vested interest in court outcomes aligns with cosmopolitan ideals of fairness, transparency, and the avoidance of conflicts of interest. This stance is consistent with cosmopolitan thinkers like Immanuel Kant, who advocated for universal principles of justice and ethical conduct. Although Kant did not specifically address the issue of judicial ethics in the context of financial transactions, his broader ethical framework suggests a commitment to impartiality and integrity that would support such a prohibition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Cosmopolitanism, focusing on universal moral principles and the global community, would likely view the unrestricted financial interactions of Supreme Court justices with interested parties as a threat to judicial impartiality and integrity. This ideology prioritizes the establishment of fair and transparent systems of governance that are free from corruption and undue influence. Allowing justices to engage in financial transactions with those who have a direct stake in court decisions could undermine public trust in the judiciary and contravene cosmopolitan principles of justice and equality. Therefore, cosmopolitanism would generally disagree with the notion that such transactions should be permitted, as it would compromise the ethical standards and global ideals of justice that the ideology upholds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Cosmopolitanism would likely disagree with this statement because it could potentially allow for conflicts of interest and corruption within the judiciary. This goes against the cosmopolitan belief in universal ethical standards and the importance of impartiality in institutions of justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.