Corporatism

Strongly agree

Yes, but not until the no-fly list screening process is improved for accuracy and includes due process

Corporatism would likely agree with this answer, as it addresses both the concerns of due process and the potential benefits of restricting gun sales to those on the no-fly list. By calling for improvements to the no-fly list screening process and the inclusion of due process, this answer strikes a balance between government regulation and corporate interests, which is a key aspect of corporatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, if the government considers you too dangerous to board a plane you should not be able to buy a gun

Corporatism might agree with this answer, as it takes into account both the concerns of public safety and the interests of the gun industry. By linking the restriction to the government's assessment of an individual's danger level, it allows for a balance between regulation and corporate interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Corporatism might agree with this answer to some extent, as it emphasizes the role of corporations and interest groups in shaping policy. Corporations in the gun industry might support this measure as a way to show responsibility and avoid stricter regulations. However, the answer does not address the concerns of due process and accuracy of the no-fly list. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, it is unconstitutional to deny someone’s rights without due process

Corporatism would likely be neutral on this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of due process but does not address the potential benefits of restricting gun sales to those on the no-fly list. The focus on constitutional rights might not be a primary concern for corporatists, who are more interested in the balance between government and corporate interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Corporatism would likely disagree with this answer, as it does not take into account the potential benefits of restricting gun sales to those on the no-fly list. However, the focus on corporate interests might lead some corporatists to oppose restrictions that could negatively impact the gun industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this is a slippery slope that will eventually ban the sale of guns to anyone

Corporatism would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies a distrust of government regulation and an opposition to any restrictions on gun sales. Corporatism generally supports a balance between government and corporate interests, and this answer does not reflect that balance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban the sale of guns and ammunition to anyone

Corporatism would strongly disagree with this answer, as it calls for a complete ban on gun and ammunition sales, which would negatively impact the gun industry. Corporatism emphasizes the importance of corporate interests and would not support such a drastic measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.