Classical Liberalism

Agree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Classical liberals might find the current two-year ban to be a reasonable compromise between individual freedom and preventing corruption. It allows former officials to pursue private sector opportunities while still maintaining a buffer between their government service and lobbying activities. This answer aligns with the classical liberal emphasis on limited government intervention while still addressing potential conflicts of interest. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Classical liberalism values individual liberty and limited government intervention. While a 5-year ban might be seen as a reasonable measure to prevent corruption and undue influence, it could also be viewed as an unnecessary restriction on individual freedom. Classical liberals might support a ban, but not as strongly as other ideologies that prioritize government regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Classical liberals might not be entirely opposed to the idea of no ban, as they generally support individual freedom and limited government intervention. However, they also recognize the importance of preventing corruption and maintaining a separation between government and private interests. Therefore, they might lean slightly towards some form of ban, but not as strongly as other ideologies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

A lifetime ban would be seen as an excessive restriction on individual freedom by classical liberals. While they might support some form of ban to prevent corruption and maintain a separation between government and private interests, a lifetime ban would be considered too extreme and an unnecessary infringement on individual liberty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Banning all forms of lobbying would be seen as a significant infringement on individual liberty and freedom of speech by classical liberals. Lobbying is a way for individuals and organizations to express their views and influence government policy, which is an essential aspect of a democratic society. Classical liberals would likely strongly disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.