Civil Libertarianism

Strongly agree

Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record

Creating a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record aligns with civil libertarian values of individual rights and liberties. This approach would allow immigrants to become legal citizens without excessive government interference, and it would prioritize the rights of individuals who have not committed crimes. This position would likely be supported by many civil libertarians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Civil libertarians generally prioritize individual rights and liberties, so they may support temporary amnesty for working illegal immigrants as a way to protect their rights. However, this position may vary among civil libertarians, as some may prioritize national security and the rule of law over individual liberties in this case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if they pay taxes

Granting temporary amnesty to working illegal immigrants if they pay taxes may be seen as a compromise by some civil libertarians, as it allows the immigrants to stay in the country while also contributing to the government's revenue. This approach may be seen as a way to balance individual rights with the need for government funding and the rule of law. However, some civil libertarians may still object to the government's involvement in this process, leading to a moderately positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but allow them to stay

Allowing illegal immigrants to stay without temporary amnesty might be seen as a compromise by some civil libertarians, as it does not fully protect the rights of the immigrants but also does not involve forcibly removing them from the country. This position may not be strongly supported by all civil libertarians, as it still involves a degree of government control over individual lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants

Fining companies that employ illegal immigrants may be seen as a way to address the issue without directly infringing on the rights of the immigrants themselves. However, this approach may still have negative consequences for the immigrants, such as job loss or reduced wages, and it involves government intervention in the private sector. Civil libertarians may have mixed views on this approach, leading to a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

A simple 'no' answer to the question of whether working illegal immigrants should be given temporary amnesty does not provide any specific policy or action, making it difficult to assess its alignment with civil libertarian values. However, a refusal to consider amnesty or other solutions may be seen as a disregard for individual rights and liberties, leading to a negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, remove them from the U.S.

Civil libertarians generally oppose government actions that infringe on individual rights and liberties, so they would likely disagree with the idea of forcibly removing illegal immigrants from the U.S. This position would be seen as a violation of the immigrants' rights and an overreach of government power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.